Bandwidth Alerts
#1
Posted 21 July 2006 - 12:26 PM
#2
Posted 21 July 2006 - 01:20 PM
Great that so many people come here.
#3
Posted 21 July 2006 - 01:22 PM
#4
Posted 21 July 2006 - 01:28 PM
#5
Posted 21 July 2006 - 01:39 PM
#6
Posted 21 July 2006 - 09:19 PM
I think having the 'problem area' inside the post is much more inviting to give it a quick look and see if you can help.
If you want to sqeeze out every byte... then just loose the stuff that nobody cares about...
- like the skin and language selector on the bottom of every singe page (people should set those things in their forum settings)
- or like the Member No. and Group info that comes along with every post. You allready have registration date and a tag that shows admin or doc-team and stuff like that.
If you say that every character is 4 bytes, that would make a difference on a monthly basis.
#7
Posted 21 July 2006 - 09:32 PM
size 76769 bytes
without the pulldown and the two things in every post: 75103
So I just saved you 1666 bytes and I lost the RSS image of 1024 bytes
So 1,5kB saved for allmost every page.
BUT I was most shocked of the HUGE amount of CSS inside the header. That should be in a linked file which can be caged by my browser. That will realy cut your bandwith in half!!
source file without the whole CSS stuff: 43518 bytes
that will save you 31585 bytes!!!!!!!!!!!
How in earth is it possible that I would find such an easy win?
#8
Posted 21 July 2006 - 09:37 PM
Change it, and you can guarantee things will break lol
#9
Posted 21 July 2006 - 09:46 PM
#10
Posted 21 July 2006 - 09:47 PM
#11
Posted 21 July 2006 - 09:57 PM
Tell me about it - but its not something we can fix - it's IPB for you....
Change it, and you can guarantee things will break lol
Well that's silly. Don't have anybody on their designteam that knows what a modem is?
I can't imagine that someone delivers a product that is not cheap to begin with and costs you a lott of (unnescessary) money to operate. Only Ferrari and Lambourgini should get away with that.
#12
Posted 21 July 2006 - 09:59 PM
#13
Posted 21 July 2006 - 10:16 PM
I'm in Sydney, surfing on my PDA via someones unprotected wireless network, so i can't check some things well right now.
But do you have compression turned on for ALL areas of the web site?
Could have been easily overlooked in some of the recent moves and changes.
Best regards, Lloyd Borrett.
#14
Posted 31 July 2006 - 06:32 PM
If it goes off, it'll be back on in the morning, as it's the 1st of the Month
#15
Guest_Maz_*
Posted 31 July 2006 - 07:01 PM
The only skin not being cached was the default Blueshell. I've now rectifed that. You should notice quite a bandwidth difference!
#16
Posted 05 August 2006 - 10:31 AM
#17
Posted 07 August 2006 - 09:12 PM
Lloyd, I have images of you lurking around peoples homes to get some free surf time!
Generally though, I think this is a great forum. Other forums I use are nowhere near as good, and in win98 and with ie5 (very old laptop) it still works - just about. Other lesser forums don't.
#18
Posted 26 August 2006 - 12:52 PM
Unique visitors: 27009
Number of visits: 43577
Pages: 303468
Hits: 1444605
Bandwidth used this month so far: 15.79 Gig
#19
Posted 29 August 2006 - 06:22 AM
I wasn't lurking or sniffing around the streets of Sydney. I happened to be staying with someone that only had 56K dial-up, and no internal LAN or wireless LAN to share it.
When I turned on my PDA it found someone nearby had an unprotected broadband wireless LAN setup. So I was back on the net.
But even then it was painful using it. Few web sites support handhelds well. Thus it is painful using most web sites from a PDA. etomite.com was no exception. And my own web mail setup is very ordinary.
Not that I'm about to volunteer to create the CSS files for a handheld version of etomite.com and Etomite Manager anytime soon.
Best Regards, Lloyd Borrett.
#20
Posted 29 August 2006 - 01:33 PM
You will be seeing more and more disparity in this regard as time progresses... Everyone wants to scramble out to get all of the neat new gadgets but they fail to realize that many developers, me included, have no plans of supporting tiny-screen technology... I won't waste one minute trying to assure that sites that I develop render properly on someones cell phone... I'm not in agreement with much of the technology overload that is being dumped into the mainstream for no other reason than to garner just a wee bit more market share... I don't even own a cell phone or PDA and have no real reason to rush out and buy one... In fact, I just saw a segment on the national news last night about how people are getting addicted to Blackberrys and other PDA's... And we all know that our children are addicted to cell phones... Ah, but I digress...<<< SNIP >>>
When I turned on my PDA it found someone nearby had an unprotected broadband wireless LAN setup. So I was back on the net.![]()
But even then it was painful using it. Few web sites support handhelds well. Thus it is painful using most web sites from a PDA. etomite.com was no exception. And my own web mail setup is very ordinary.
<<< SNIP >>>
Best Regards, Lloyd Borrett.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











